Hangul Letter Yo-ya

U+3187
BMP Unicode 1.1
Character
Decimal ㆇ
Hex ㆇ

Classification

Unicode properties assigned to this character by the Unicode Consortium. The codepoint is its unique numeric identifier. Category, block, and script determine how text systems render and process it.

Codepoint
U+3187
Decimal
12679
Plane
BMP — Basic Multilingual Plane
Category
Other Letter (Lo)
Script
Hangul
Bidi class
L Left-to-Right
East Asian Width
W Wide
Properties
Alphabetic ID Start ID Continue

Looks Like (Confusables)

Characters that are visually similar — relevant for security, font design, and homoglyph detection.

ᅭᅣ U+116D U+1163

Encodings & Escape Sequences

Every Unicode character can be represented in multiple ways depending on context. HTML entities let you embed it safely in web pages. UTF-8 bytes are what gets stored on disk and sent over the network. Escape sequences let you reference it in source code without pasting the raw glyph. All formats below refer to the same character — Hangul Letter Yo-ya.

Click the copy icon to copy any value.

Format Value
HTML Decimal
ㆇ
HTML Hex
ㆇ
UTF-8 Hex Bytes
E3 86 87
UTF-16 Hex Bytes
31 87
UTF-32 Hex
00003187
CSS Escape
\3187
JavaScript Escape
\u3187
Python Escape
\u3187
URL Encoded
%E3%86%87
Have a string containing this character? Decode it to see every codepoint. UnicodeDecoder →

Normalization Forms

Unicode defines four normalization forms that affect how characters with diacritics, compatibility variants, and combining marks are represented. This character has a non-trivial normalization — the forms below differ from its codepoint. Mismatched normalization is the most common cause of failed string comparisons across systems.

NFC = Canonical Decomposition then Canonical Composition (preferred for storage) · NFD = Canonical Decomposition · NFKC/NFKD = Compatibility forms (fold variants like fi → fi)

Decomposition

This character can be broken down into a sequence of simpler Unicode codepoints. This is a compatibility decomposition — the character is a stylistic or semantic variant of its components, not an exact equivalent.