Arabic Ligature Yeh With Hamza Above With Ae Isolated Form

U+FBEC
BMP Unicode 1.1
Character
Decimal ﯬ
Hex ﯬ

Classification

Unicode properties assigned to this character by the Unicode Consortium. The codepoint is its unique numeric identifier. Category, block, and script determine how text systems render and process it.

Codepoint
U+FBEC
Decimal
64492
Plane
BMP — Basic Multilingual Plane
Category
Other Letter (Lo)
Script
Arabic
Bidi class
AL Arabic Letter (Right-to-Left)
East Asian Width
N Narrow
Properties
Alphabetic ID Start ID Continue

Looks Like (Confusables)

Characters that are visually similar — relevant for security, font design, and homoglyph detection.

ىٴo U+0649 U+0674 U+006F

Encodings & Escape Sequences

Every Unicode character can be represented in multiple ways depending on context. HTML entities let you embed it safely in web pages. UTF-8 bytes are what gets stored on disk and sent over the network. Escape sequences let you reference it in source code without pasting the raw glyph. All formats below refer to the same character — Arabic Ligature Yeh With Hamza Above With Ae Isolated Form.

Click the copy icon to copy any value.

Format Value
HTML Decimal
ﯬ
HTML Hex
ﯬ
UTF-8 Hex Bytes
EF AF AC
UTF-16 Hex Bytes
FB EC
UTF-32 Hex
0000FBEC
CSS Escape
\FBEC
JavaScript Escape
\uFBEC
Python Escape
\uFBEC
URL Encoded
%EF%AF%AC
Have a string containing this character? Decode it to see every codepoint. UnicodeDecoder →

Normalization Forms

Unicode defines four normalization forms that affect how characters with diacritics, compatibility variants, and combining marks are represented. This character has a non-trivial normalization — the forms below differ from its codepoint. Mismatched normalization is the most common cause of failed string comparisons across systems.

NFC = Canonical Decomposition then Canonical Composition (preferred for storage) · NFD = Canonical Decomposition · NFKC/NFKD = Compatibility forms (fold variants like fi → fi)

Decomposition

This character can be broken down into a sequence of simpler Unicode codepoints. This is a compatibility decomposition — the character is a stylistic or semantic variant of its components, not an exact equivalent.